From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/8] RX NFC support for hash-based filters Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 21:39:30 +0000 Message-ID: <1325713170.3764.2.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <1325627819.2832.31.camel@bwh-desktop> <20120104.141111.16071561018650942.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:57289 "EHLO ocex02.SolarFlarecom.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754203Ab2ADVjg (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:39:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120104.141111.16071561018650942.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 14:11 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:56:59 +0000 > > > 1. Fix gianfar's validation of filter rule locations. In the previous > > version of this series, this was a requirement for part 2, but that's > > no longer the case. > > > > 2. Extend ethtool RX NFC rules API to support hash-based filter hardware > > in which rule locations should be selected by the driver or firmware. > > > > 3. Change the sfc driver to implement this API instead of RX n-tuple. > > > > 4. Remove support for RX n-tuple, now that there are no in-tree > > implementations. > > All applied, I had to fix some trailing whitespace errors in patches > 5 and 6. Thanks, and sorry about the formatting. I should try to work out why git didn't alert me to that earlier... Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.