* [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets.
@ 2011-12-23 10:32 Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-12 13:11 ` Jeff Kirsher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2011-12-23 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Matthew Vick, netdev, gospo, sassmann, Jeff Kirsher
From: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
When support was added to dump the registers on 82575 chipset devices,
six register offsets (receive/transmit desc length, head, and tail)
were incorrectly mapped. This patch remaps the offsets to the correct
registers.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
igb.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/igb.c b/igb.c
index ec35d36..e0ccef9 100644
--- a/igb.c
+++ b/igb.c
@@ -200,13 +200,13 @@ igb_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo *info, struct ethtool_regs *regs)
/* Receive descriptor registers */
fprintf(stdout,
"0x02808: RDLEN (Receive desc length) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[142]);
+ regs_buff[137]);
fprintf(stdout,
"0x02810: RDH (Receive desc head) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[146]);
+ regs_buff[141]);
fprintf(stdout,
"0x02818: RDT (Receive desc tail) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[150]);
+ regs_buff[145]);
/* Transmit control register */
reg = regs_buff[38];
@@ -226,13 +226,13 @@ igb_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo *info, struct ethtool_regs *regs)
/* Transmit descriptor registers */
fprintf(stdout,
"0x03808: TDLEN (Transmit desc length) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[214]);
+ regs_buff[219]);
fprintf(stdout,
"0x03810: TDH (Transmit desc head) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[218]);
+ regs_buff[223]);
fprintf(stdout,
"0x03818: TDT (Transmit desc tail) 0x%08X\n",
- regs_buff[222]);
+ regs_buff[227]);
fprintf(stdout,
--
1.7.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets.
2011-12-23 10:32 [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets Jeff Kirsher
@ 2012-01-12 13:11 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2012-01-12 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Vick, Matthew, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
sassmann@redhat.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2271 bytes --]
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 02:32 -0800, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
> From: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
>
> When support was added to dump the registers on 82575 chipset devices,
> six register offsets (receive/transmit desc length, head, and tail)
> were incorrectly mapped. This patch remaps the offsets to the correct
> registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> ---
> igb.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/igb.c b/igb.c
> index ec35d36..e0ccef9 100644
> --- a/igb.c
> +++ b/igb.c
> @@ -200,13 +200,13 @@ igb_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo *info, struct ethtool_regs *regs)
> /* Receive descriptor registers */
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x02808: RDLEN (Receive desc length) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[142]);
> + regs_buff[137]);
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x02810: RDH (Receive desc head) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[146]);
> + regs_buff[141]);
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x02818: RDT (Receive desc tail) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[150]);
> + regs_buff[145]);
>
> /* Transmit control register */
> reg = regs_buff[38];
> @@ -226,13 +226,13 @@ igb_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo *info, struct ethtool_regs *regs)
> /* Transmit descriptor registers */
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x03808: TDLEN (Transmit desc length) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[214]);
> + regs_buff[219]);
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x03810: TDH (Transmit desc head) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[218]);
> + regs_buff[223]);
> fprintf(stdout,
> "0x03818: TDT (Transmit desc tail) 0x%08X\n",
> - regs_buff[222]);
> + regs_buff[227]);
>
>
> fprintf(stdout,
> --
> 1.7.7.4
>
Ben, what is the status of this patch?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets.
2012-01-12 13:11 ` Jeff Kirsher
@ 2012-01-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-12 14:35 ` Jeff Kirsher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2012-01-12 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher
Cc: Vick, Matthew, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
sassmann@redhat.com
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 05:11 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 02:32 -0800, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
> > From: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
> >
> > When support was added to dump the registers on 82575 chipset devices,
> > six register offsets (receive/transmit desc length, head, and tail)
> > were incorrectly mapped. This patch remaps the offsets to the correct
> > registers.
[...]
> Ben, what is the status of this patch?
The status is 'arrived just as I went on vacation, and forgotten'.
I'll be sure to apply this before releasing ethtool 3.2.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets.
2012-01-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
@ 2012-01-12 14:35 ` Jeff Kirsher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2012-01-12 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Vick, Matthew, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
sassmann@redhat.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 14:08 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 05:11 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 02:32 -0800, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
> > > From: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>
> > >
> > > When support was added to dump the registers on 82575 chipset devices,
> > > six register offsets (receive/transmit desc length, head, and tail)
> > > were incorrectly mapped. This patch remaps the offsets to the correct
> > > registers.
> [...]
> > Ben, what is the status of this patch?
>
> The status is 'arrived just as I went on vacation, and forgotten'.
:)
>
> I'll be sure to apply this before releasing ethtool 3.2.
Thanks Ben!
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-12 14:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-23 10:32 [ethtool] ethtool: Correct register dump offsets for Intel 82575 chipsets Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-12 13:11 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-12 14:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-12 14:35 ` Jeff Kirsher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).