From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Hung task when calling clone() due to netfilter/slab Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:20:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1326813630.2259.19.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> References: <1326558605.19951.7.camel@lappy> <1326561043.5287.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1326632384.11711.3.camel@lappy> <1326648305.5287.78.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Sasha Levin , Dave Jones , davem , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , kaber@trash.net, pablo@netfilter.org, linux-kernel , linux-mm , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le mardi 17 janvier 2012 =C3=A0 09:12 -0600, Christoph Lameter a =C3=A9= crit : > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote: >=20 > > As soon as the slub_lock is released, another thread can come and f= ind > > the new kmem_cache. >=20 > Slabs are not looked up by name. A pointer to kmem_cache is passed to= slab > functions and that pointer is returned from kmem_cache_create(). The = risk > is someone traversing the kmem_cach list which is only done from with= in slub. >=20 >=20 > Subject: slub: Do not hold slub_lock when calling sysfs_slab_add() >=20 > sysfs_slab_add() calls various sysfs functions that actually may > end up in userspace doing all sorts of things. >=20 > Release the slub_lock after adding the kmem_cache structure to the li= st. > At that point the address of the kmem_cache is not known so we are > guaranteed exlusive access to the following modifications to the > kmem_cache structure. >=20 > If the sysfs_slab_add fails then reacquire the slub_lock to > remove the kmem_cache structure from the list. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter >=20 > --- > mm/slub.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c 2012-01-17 03:07:11.140010438 -0600 > +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2012-01-17 03:07:19.532010264 -0600 > @@ -3929,13 +3929,15 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con > if (kmem_cache_open(s, n, > size, align, flags, ctor)) { > list_add(&s->list, &slab_caches); > + up_write(&slub_lock); > if (sysfs_slab_add(s)) { > + down_write(&slub_lock); > list_del(&s->list); > + up_write(&slub_lock); > kfree(n); > kfree(s); > goto err; > } > - up_write(&slub_lock); > return s; > } > kfree(n); Buggy patch, since "goto err;" is going to up_write(&slub_lock) again. Also Christoph, you forgot to add the very much needed : Reported-by: Sasha Levin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html