From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V4 0/2] igb: ptp hardware clock
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:24:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327638293.2729.43.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1327161325.git.richardcochran@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3116 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 17:03 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> * ChangeLog
> ** V4
> - Use standard kernel cyclecounter/timecounter infrastructure
> instead of a home grown counter overflow implementation.
> ** V3
> - Driver compiles even without CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK.
> - Timestamping always works, even when PTP code missing or fails.
> ** V2
> - Fixed wrong bit shifting in the 82576 code.
> - Explained the timestamp locking with a comment in the code.
> - Preserved the comments from the original timecompare implementation.
> - Added an additional test within the overflow counter code to fix
> a race condition. Details of the problem are given in the commit
> message.
>
> This patch series implements a PHC driver for the Intel 82576 and
> 82580 devices, as part of the igb driver. Only the base clock
> operations are implemented. The hardware does have some ancillary
> features, but these can be easily added later.
>
> The first patch adds the PHC driver code as a new source module but
> does not link it into the main igb driver. Because the system time
> counter is not so very wide, the code uses the overflow counter from
> the cyclecounter/timecounter code. Every read operation maintains the
> overflow counter, as does a "delayed work" watchdog.
>
> The second patch removes the timecompare code and links in the new
> functions.
>
> I have tested the 82580 with good results. However, I don't have the
> 82576 and so would appreciate testing and feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> Richard Cochran (2):
> igb: add PTP Hardware Clock code
> igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 20 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 167 +------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 388 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 407 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
>
Added Aaron Brown to the thread
Richard-
Did you compile test? Why I ask is our validation team is getting the
following errors when trying to compile in PTP support:
---------------------------
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c: In function âigb_ptp_initâ:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c:266: error: âTHIS_MODULEâ undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c:266: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c:266: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[5]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb] Error 2
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
-------------------------------
Cheers,
Jeff
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-21 16:03 [PATCH net V4 0/2] igb: ptp hardware clock Richard Cochran
2012-01-21 16:03 ` [PATCH net V4 1/2] igb: add PTP Hardware Clock code Richard Cochran
2012-01-23 18:39 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-01-24 17:44 ` Richard Cochran
2012-01-24 21:23 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-01-27 19:25 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-01-21 16:03 ` [PATCH net V4 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method Richard Cochran
2012-01-23 3:57 ` [PATCH net V4 0/2] igb: ptp hardware clock Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-27 4:24 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2012-01-27 10:11 ` Richard Cochran
2012-01-27 10:15 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-27 10:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-27 10:56 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-27 12:11 ` Richard Cochran
2012-01-27 20:42 ` Brown, Aaron F
2012-01-28 8:26 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327638293.2729.43.camel@jtkirshe-mobl \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).