netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] ixgbe: Add module parameter to allow untested and unsafe SFP+ modules
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:35:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328124916.12731.0.camel@probook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328123961-17237-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:19 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
> 
> The X520 family of network devices, with the 82599 chip, support a
> small number of Intel-verified SFP+ modules on their NICs.  To maintain
> stability and quality, the current devices restrict untested 3rd party
> SFP+ modules.
> 
> This patch introduces a module parameter for ixgbe to allow these untested
> modules at the user's peril.  It also includes a warning to the syslog
> alerting users that the modules aren't supported, and results may
> vary.
> 
> CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Phil Schmitt <phillip.j.schmitt@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-01 19:19 [net-next] ixgbe: Add module parameter to allow untested and unsafe SFP+ modules Jeff Kirsher
2012-02-01 19:24 ` David Miller
2012-02-01 19:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1328124916.12731.0.camel@probook \
    --to=jdb@comx.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gospo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).