From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@emulex.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] if_link : add support for VF privileges
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:24:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329261897.2443.60.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120214192627.GA14163@akhaparde-VBox>
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:26 -0600, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@emulex.com>
> ---
> include/linux/if_link.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +++
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_link.h b/include/linux/if_link.h
> index c52d4b5..9c93a8e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -280,11 +280,26 @@ enum {
> IFLA_VF_VLAN,
> IFLA_VF_TX_RATE, /* TX Bandwidth Allocation */
> IFLA_VF_SPOOFCHK, /* Spoof Checking on/off switch */
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE, /* VF Privilege level setting */
> __IFLA_VF_MAX,
> };
>
> #define IFLA_VF_MAX (__IFLA_VF_MAX - 1)
>
> +enum {
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_DEFAULT = 1, /* Default privileges */
What are the default privileges? Should existing drivers report that
their VFs have this?
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_STATS = 2, /* Privilege to gather statistics */
I assume that means port or board statistics as opposed to statistics
for the VF?
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_LNK_MGMT = 4, /* Privilege to manage link params */
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_DIAG = 8, /* Privilege to perform diagnostics */
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_MAC = 16, /* Privilege to modify MAC address */
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_VLAN = 32, /* Privilege to add or remove VLANs */
I assume these two apply to RX filtering of the VF itself. How about
control over TX filtering?
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_DEV_CFG = 64, /* Unrestricted admin access privlege */
Does that include all the other privileges, or does it mean 'everything
else'?
> + IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_SECURE = 128, /* Privilege to access secure content */
What does that mean?
> + __IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +#define IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_MAX (__IFLA_VF_PRIVILEGE_MAX - 1)
[...]
This doesn't seem to make sense for an enumeration of flags.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 19:26 [RFC net-next 1/2] if_link : add support for VF privileges Ajit Khaparde
2012-02-14 23:24 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2012-02-21 22:02 ` Ajit.Khaparde
2012-02-21 22:04 ` David Miller
2012-02-21 22:43 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-03-01 18:54 ` Ajit.Khaparde
2012-03-01 18:53 ` Ajit.Khaparde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329261897.2443.60.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@emulex.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox