From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/19] sfc: Skip RX end-of-batch work on channels without an RX queue
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:44:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329353070.2565.27.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329352938.2565.26.camel@bwh-desktop>
The code in efx_process_channel() to update the RX queue after each
batch of RX completions works out as a no-op on a TX-only channel
where the RX queue structure is set to all-zeroes, but
(1) efx_channel_get_rx_queue() will BUG() if DEBUG is defined, and
(2) it's a waste of time.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
index 952d0bf..b7cf9f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
@@ -224,19 +224,20 @@ static int efx_process_channel(struct efx_channel *channel, int budget)
return 0;
spent = efx_nic_process_eventq(channel, budget);
- if (spent == 0)
- return 0;
+ if (spent && efx_channel_has_rx_queue(channel)) {
+ struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue =
+ efx_channel_get_rx_queue(channel);
+
+ /* Deliver last RX packet. */
+ if (channel->rx_pkt) {
+ __efx_rx_packet(channel, channel->rx_pkt);
+ channel->rx_pkt = NULL;
+ }
- /* Deliver last RX packet. */
- if (channel->rx_pkt) {
- __efx_rx_packet(channel, channel->rx_pkt);
- channel->rx_pkt = NULL;
+ efx_rx_strategy(channel);
+ efx_fast_push_rx_descriptors(rx_queue);
}
- efx_rx_strategy(channel);
-
- efx_fast_push_rx_descriptors(efx_channel_get_rx_queue(channel));
-
return spent;
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 0:42 pull request: sfc-next 2012-02-16 Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:44 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2012-02-16 0:44 ` [PATCH net-next 02/19] sfc: Do not retry hardware probe if it schedules a reset Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:45 ` [PATCH net-next 03/19] sfc: Replace some literal constants with EFX_PAGE_SIZE/EFX_BUF_SIZE Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:45 ` [PATCH net-next 04/19] sfc: Warn if unable to create MTDs Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:46 ` [PATCH net-next 05/19] sfc: Add support for configuring RX unicast/multicast default filters Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:46 ` [PATCH net-next 06/19] sfc: Add support for TX MAC filters Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/19] sfc: Correct MAC filter bitfield definitions Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/19] sfc: Generalise driver event generation Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/19] sfc: Generate RX fill events based on RX queues, not channels Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:48 ` [PATCH net-next 10/19] sfc: Leave interrupts and event queues enabled whenever we can Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:48 ` [PATCH net-next 11/19] sfc: Use proper function to test for RX channel in efx_poll() Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:48 ` [PATCH net-next 12/19] sfc: Generalise event generation to cover VF-owned event queues Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next 13/19] sfc: Disable flow control during flushes Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:49 ` [PATCH net-next 14/19] sfc: Make buffer table indices and counts consistently unsigned Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:50 ` [PATCH net-next 15/19] sfc: Make all CPU/IRQ/channel/queue counts unsigned Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:50 ` [PATCH net-next 16/19] sfc: Add support for 'extra' channel types Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:51 ` [PATCH net-next 17/19] sfc: Pass NIC structure into efx_wanted_parallelism() Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:52 ` [PATCH net-next 18/19] sfc: Allocate SRAM between buffer table and descriptor caches at init time Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 0:52 ` [PATCH net-next 19/19] sfc: Add SR-IOV back-end support for SFC9000 family Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 1:18 ` John Fastabend
2012-02-16 1:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-21 19:52 ` John Fastabend
2012-02-21 20:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 22:08 ` pull request: sfc-next 2012-02-16 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329353070.2565.27.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).