From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: RE: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:46:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1329903974.4657.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: (sfid-20120222_103559_848738_672B22CE) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Allan, Bruce W" , Joe Perches , David Miller , Andy Whitcroft , Andrew Morton , andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Laight Return-path: In-Reply-To: (sfid-20120222_103559_848738_672B22CE) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:35 +0000, David Laight wrote: > > if (!(func_a(x) && > > func_b(y))) > > baz(); > > Gah - that is horrid for the 'preferred style'. > A quick glance at the code puts both the func_b() > and baz() calls as inside the if. You forgot to read/quote the rest of Allan's email: > Assuming my stupid mailer will screw up the indentation above, the 'a' > in addr in the first example is meant to be immediately below the 'n' > in nr, and the two 'f's in func_* are meant to be vertically lined up > in the second example. johannes