From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@vmware.com>,
Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Scott J. Goldman" <scottjg@vmware.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: Re: WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:159 _local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x71()
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:22:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330003354.11248.9.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329998028.15610.14.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:53 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hmm, I am not sure we still need local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() in
> kmap_skb_frag()/ kunmap_skb_frag() anymore after commit 3e4d3af501ccc
> (mm: stack based kmap_atomic() )
The only thing to consider is keeping the total stack size under
control, this is somewhat non-trivial since its non-obvious what all
nests.
That said, you're probably right, and we do have a WARN in there
(dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM) that yells if we exceed the
available stack size.
The more 'interesting' exercise is determining a better upper bound on
the stack size and updating kmap_types.h accordingly.
> diff --git a/net/core/kmap_skb.h b/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> index 81e1ed7..06be5ee 100644
> --- a/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> +++ b/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> @@ -2,18 +2,10 @@
>
> static inline void *kmap_skb_frag(const skb_frag_t *frag)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> - BUG_ON(in_irq());
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> -#endif
> return kmap_atomic(skb_frag_page(frag), KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> }
>
> static inline void kunmap_skb_frag(void *vaddr)
> {
> kunmap_atomic(vaddr, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> - local_bh_enable();
> -#endif
> }
The nicer patch would of course be a patch that does:
s/kunmap_skb_frag/kunmap_atomic/
s/kmap_skb_frag(\([^)]*\))/kmap_atomic(skb_frag_page(\1))/
There is no need to retain the KM_* argument and the 'helper' functions
are quite pointless at that point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 1:03 Re: WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:159 _local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x71() Jongman Heo
2012-02-23 10:42 ` Francois Romieu
2012-02-23 11:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-23 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-02-29 8:18 ` Shreyas Bhatewara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330003354.11248.9.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jongman.heo@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=sbhatewara@vmware.com \
--cc=scottjg@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).