From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sfc: Fix assignment of ip_summed for pre-allocated skbs
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:12:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330132354.2397.18.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330132277.2397.17.camel@bwh-desktop>
When pre-allocating skbs for received packets, we set ip_summed =
CHECKSUM_UNNCESSARY. We used to change it back to CHECKSUM_NONE when
the received packet had an incorrect checksum or unhandled protocol.
Commit bc8acf2c8c3e43fcc192762a9f964b3e9a17748b ('drivers/net: avoid
some skb->ip_summed initializations') mistakenly replaced the latter
assignment with a DEBUG-only assertion that ip_summed ==
CHECKSUM_NONE. This assertion is always false, but it seems no-one
has exercised this code path in a DEBUG build.
Fix this by moving our assignment of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY into
efx_rx_packet_gro().
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
index aca3498..fc52fca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
@@ -156,11 +156,10 @@ static int efx_init_rx_buffers_skb(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue)
if (unlikely(!skb))
return -ENOMEM;
- /* Adjust the SKB for padding and checksum */
+ /* Adjust the SKB for padding */
skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
rx_buf->len = skb_len - NET_IP_ALIGN;
rx_buf->is_page = false;
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
rx_buf->dma_addr = pci_map_single(efx->pci_dev,
skb->data, rx_buf->len,
@@ -496,6 +495,7 @@ static void efx_rx_packet_gro(struct efx_channel *channel,
EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(!checksummed);
rx_buf->u.skb = NULL;
+ skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
gro_result = napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-25 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-25 1:11 pull request: sfc 2012-02-25 Ben Hutchings
2012-02-25 1:12 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2012-02-25 6:01 ` [PATCH net] sfc: Fix assignment of ip_summed for pre-allocated skbs Eric Dumazet
2012-02-25 3:13 ` pull request: sfc 2012-02-25 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330132354.2397.18.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).