From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shirley Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vhost: allow multiple workers threads Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:43:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1330980207.25997.2.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com> References: <1329519726-25763-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1329519726-25763-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20120219144145.GA16620@redhat.com> <20120220192708.GA18308@redhat.com> <4F42A2FB.7000501@us.ibm.com> <20120220210005.GA19278@redhat.com> <1329786250.13141.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20120221032147.GB2502@redhat.com> <1329796998.13141.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4F54BDE9.5080505@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Anthony Liguori , Tom Lendacky , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cristian Viana To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:59777 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757496Ab2CEUnf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:43:35 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:43:35 -0700 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BC2C90065 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:43:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q25KhVfW237840 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:43:31 -0500 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q25KhUXr027800 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:43:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4F54BDE9.5080505@codemonkey.ws> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 07:21 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi Shirley, > > Are you planning on posting these patches soon? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori I thought to compare with different scheduling with different NICs before submitting it. Maybe it's better to submit a RFC patch to get review comments now. Let me clean up the patch and submit it here. Thanks Shirley