From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lpc32xx: Added ethernet driver Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:49:18 -0800 Message-ID: <1330994958.9504.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1330983641-32622-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1330987524.2538.61.camel@bwh-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roland Stigge , davem@davemloft.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, eilong@broadcom.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, baruch@tkos.co.il, joe@perches.com To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1330987524.2538.61.camel@bwh-desktop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:45 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > [...] ... > > + /* Copy packet from buffer */ > > + memcpy(prdbuf, > > + pldat->rx_buff_v[rxconsidx], len); > > + > > + /* Pass to upper layer */ > > + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev); > > + netif_rx(skb); > > + ndev->last_rx = jiffies; > > Drivers don't need to set last_rx any more. Also, a NAPI driver should call netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() netif_rx() is more expensive because of additional queue, while netif_receive_skb() directly calls the upper stacks.