From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] conntrack, suspicious RCU usage Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:01:09 -0800 Message-ID: <1331013669.2474.31.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1330950269-32668-1-git-send-email-hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> <20120305170548.GA28986@1984> <20120305223815.GA30456@1984> <201203060658.16156.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "hans@schillstrom.com" To: Hans Schillstrom Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201203060658.16156.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le mardi 06 mars 2012 =C3=A0 06:58 +0100, Hans Schillstrom a =C3=A9crit= : > On Monday 05 March 2012 23:38:15 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:24:29PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > > > From: Hans Schillstrom > > > >=20 > > > > Hello Pablo > > > > I think you lost this patch from Eric, I updated the patch for = the=20 > > > > latest nf_conntrack_netlink.c=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Well, __nf_ct_l4proto_find() being out of line and the way we a= lready > > > > use rcu_read_lock() in this code, it seems following patch is > > > > the most natural way to cope with these lockdep warnings. > > >=20 > > > I'll take the previous patch to pass it to current -rc. Thanks Ha= ns. > >=20 > > I'll pass it to net-next, otherwise this will result in one conflic= t > > with one patch already in net-next if I pass it to net. > > > =20 > Thanks a lot > /Hans Thanks guys, I completely forgot to make sure this patch was applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html