From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lpc32xx: Added ethernet driver: smp_wmb() Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:03:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1331042608.2347.1.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <1330983641-32622-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1330987524.2538.61.camel@bwh-desktop> <4F55EA6D.3070602@antcom.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , To: Roland Stigge Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F55EA6D.3070602@antcom.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:43 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 03/05/2012 11:45 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> + /* Clear and enable interrupts */ > >> + writel(0xFFFF, LPC_ENET_INTCLEAR(pldat->net_base)); > >> + lpc_eth_enable_int(pldat->net_base); > >> + > >> + /* Get the next TX buffer output index */ > >> + pldat->num_used_tx_buffs = 0; > >> + pldat->last_tx_idx = > >> + readl(LPC_ENET_TXCONSUMEINDEX(pldat->net_base)); > > > > Doesn't this need to be done *before* enabling interrupts? Also, I > > think you need an smp_wmb() so that the interrupt handler is guaranteed > > to see all these writes. > > Do you mean _one_ smp_wmb() directly after lpc_eth_enable_int() (which > I'm moving behind the above code? The sequence should be pldat->state = values...; smp_wmb(); enable_interrupts(); > Note that there is no SMP in LPCs and NXP is not planning to build one > AFAIK. Never say never! > However, I'm fine with including smp_wmb() anyway for completeness. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.