From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:14:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1332990846.3402.5.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1332860951-23042-1-git-send-email-amirv@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier , Yevgeny Petrilin , Oren Duer , Amir Vadai , John Fastabend , Amir Vadai To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:59629 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758049Ab2C2DOM (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:14:12 -0400 Received: by eaaq12 with SMTP id q12so547213eaa.19 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:14:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 =C3=A0 00:21 +0200, Or Gerlitz a =C3=A9crit : > For the ratelimit Eric D. provided feedback and it was implemented > along his suggestion, My suggestion was exactly the following : /sys/class/net/eth2/qos/0/ratelimit =2E.. /sys/class/net/eth2/qos/7/ratelimit > and now John and Ben have other suggestions, I dont think so. Amir provided in V2 something that was not what I suggested. /sys/class/net/eth2/ratelimit/tc0 =2E.. /sys/class/net/eth2/ratelimit/tc7 And this is where John, Ben were complaining. [ Obviously I totally agree with them ]