From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] bpf_jit drops the ball on indirect negative mem references Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:57:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1333029475.3402.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1332965129.2325.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1332967172.2325.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4F744D58.3070009@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Matt Evans To: Jan Seiffert Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:39647 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079Ab2C2N6Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:58:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F744D58.3070009@googlemail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 =C3=A0 13:54 +0200, Jan Seiffert a =C3=A9crit : > Ok, to keep the ball rolling here is a V2 with the changes you sugges= ted: >=20 =2E.. > I propose the following patch to fix this situation. > Lightly tested on x86, but the powerpc asm part is prop. wrong. >=20 >=20 > Signed-of-by: Jan Seiffert >=20 x86 part seems very good at first glance, I'll test it and give my feedback soon. Thanks !