From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] bpf_jit drops the ball on indirect negative mem references Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:08:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1333116493.2325.2125.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1332965129.2325.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1332967172.2325.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4F744D58.3070009@googlemail.com> <1333098711.19659.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4F75B828.3090705@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Matt Evans To: Jan Seiffert Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F75B828.3090705@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:42 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote: > Do you know where i can ping the powerpc guys a little bit harder? maybe using CC linux-arch@vger.kernel.org One way to handle that would be to split this patch in 3 parts, so that I can Ack the non ppc part. [1] introduce bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper() [BTW no need to EXPORT_SYMBOL it, since jit is not a module ] [2] x86_bpf_iit: handle negative offsets in loads [3] ppc_bpf_jit: handle negative offsets in loads