From: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
To: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com>,
benve@cisco.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
govind.varadar@gmail.com
Cc: ssuryaextr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net] net: handle 802.1P vlan 0 packets properly
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:34:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13332a7b-bd3d-e546-27d1-402ed8013f41@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610183122.4521-1-gvaradar@cisco.com>
On 2019/06/11 3:31, Govindarajulu Varadarajan wrote:
> When stack receives pkt: [802.1P vlan 0][802.1AD vlan 100][IPv4],
> vlan_do_receive() returns false if it does not find vlan_dev. Later
> __netif_receive_skb_core() fails to find packet type handler for
> skb->protocol 801.1AD and drops the packet.
>
> 801.1P header with vlan id 0 should be handled as untagged packets.
> This patch fixes it by checking if vlan_id is 0 and processes next vlan
> header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com>
> ---
> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> index a313165e7a67..0cde54c02c3f 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,32 @@
> bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb = *skbp;
> - __be16 vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
> - u16 vlan_id = skb_vlan_tag_get_id(skb);
> + __be16 vlan_proto;
> + u16 vlan_id;
> struct net_device *vlan_dev;
> struct vlan_pcpu_stats *rx_stats;
>
> +again:
> + vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
> + vlan_id = skb_vlan_tag_get_id(skb);
> vlan_dev = vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_proto, vlan_id);
> - if (!vlan_dev)
> + if (!vlan_dev) {
> + /* Incase of 802.1P header with vlan id 0, continue if
> + * vlan_dev is not found.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!vlan_id)) {
> + __vlan_hwaccel_clear_tag(skb);
Looks like this changes existing behavior. Priority-tagged packets will be untagged
before bridge, etc. I think priority-tagged packets should be forwarded as priority-tagged
(iff bridge is not vlan-aware), not untagged.
> + if (skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_8021Q) ||
> + skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_8021AD)) {
> + skb = skb_vlan_untag(skb);
> + *skbp = skb;
> + if (unlikely(!skb))
> + return false;
> + goto again;
> + }
> + }
> return false;
> + }
>
> skb = *skbp = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(!skb))
>
Toshiaki Makita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 18:31 [PATCH RESEND net] net: handle 802.1P vlan 0 packets properly Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2019-06-11 4:34 ` Toshiaki Makita [this message]
2019-06-11 21:57 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan (gvaradar)
2019-06-12 6:19 ` Toshiaki Makita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13332a7b-bd3d-e546-27d1-402ed8013f41@gmail.com \
--to=toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=govind.varadar@gmail.com \
--cc=gvaradar@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssuryaextr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).