From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: net: more accurate skb truesize - regression on Microblaze
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:32:26 +0200
Message-ID: <1334046746.3126.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
References: <4F83EB0E.4020104@monstr.eu>
	 <1334046444.3126.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: monstr@monstr.eu
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56246 "EHLO
	mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758543Ab2DJIcb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:32:31 -0400
Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so3963766bkc.19
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1334046444.3126.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 10:27 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> BTW, some NIC drivers are known to provide fat skb in their rx path, and
> need to be fixed as well. (Some others just lie about skb->truesize to
> avoid the tcp slowdown, see my previous iwlwifi patch)
> 
> 

What is the driver you currently use on your platform ?