From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: fake rtable dst patch applied but kernel keeps panicing Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:22:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1334928167.2395.232.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <4F8E9291.9000607@navynet.it> <1334745072.2472.110.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4F8FC66F.90703@navynet.it> <1334823256.2395.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1334825108.2395.28.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4F913429.2040705@navynet.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com To: Massimo Cetra Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:43497 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756215Ab2DTNWw (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:22:52 -0400 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so7182307bkc.19 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:22:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F913429.2040705@navynet.it> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 12:02 +0200, Massimo Cetra wrote: > > i applied this patch and Peters last patch to a 3.3.2 kernel. > The result was a bit disappointing because the step was backwards. > > Locally, from the same machine, i could ping each IP of each tun > interface used by any virtual server. > > From the LAN such addresses were not pingable while the ip address of > the bridge was reachable. > > Max I dont know, this code is crap and should be fixed. This nf_bridge_unshare() is obviously buggy as hell.