From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module
 EEPROM
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:44:45 +0100
Message-ID: <1335289485.17274.46.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
References: <4F9031BF.10106@solarflare.com>
	 <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <smhodgson@solarflare.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bruce.w.allan@intel.com>, <decot@google.com>,
	<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact
> Subject line.
> 
> Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what
> is different in each of these changes.
> 
> There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review
> them?  If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it?  If not, why not?

Sorry, I've been busy with another project.  I'll reply to Stuart's
patches faster next round.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.