netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net 1/2] e1000e: MSI interrupt test failed, using legacy interrupt
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:55:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335333314-6814-2-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335333314-6814-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

From: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com>

Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs,
while using MSI interrupts as shown below:

Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0d.0: lan0_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0d.0: wan0_1: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0d.0: lan0_1: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.warn kernel: 0000:40:0e.0: wan4_0: MSI interrupt
test failed, using legacy interrupt.
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0e.0: wan1_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0e.0: lan1_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0f.0: wan2_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:00:0f.0: lan2_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0a.0: wan3_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:33 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0a.0: lan3_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0e.0: lan4_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0f.0: wan5_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Feb 16 15:09:34 (none) user.notice kernel: 0000:40:0f.0: lan5_0: NIC Link is Up
1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX

This patch fixes this problem by increasing the msleep from 50 to 100.

Signed-off-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 19ab215..9520a6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -3799,7 +3799,7 @@ static int e1000_test_msi_interrupt(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
 	/* fire an unusual interrupt on the test handler */
 	ew32(ICS, E1000_ICS_RXSEQ);
 	e1e_flush();
-	msleep(50);
+	msleep(100);
 
 	e1000_irq_disable(adapter);
 
-- 
1.7.7.6

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-25  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-25  5:55 [net 0/2][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-25  5:55 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2012-04-25 15:59   ` [net 1/2] e1000e: MSI interrupt test failed, using legacy interrupt Ben Hutchings
2012-04-25 22:46     ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2012-04-25  5:55 ` [net 2/2] e1000e: Fix default interrupt throttle rate not set in NIC HW Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-26  9:11 ` [net 0/2][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335333314-6814-2-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gospo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ppanchamukhi@riverbed.com \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).