From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:47:31 +1000 Message-ID: <1335833251.20866.96.camel@pasglop> References: <1335760199.20866.33.camel@pasglop> <4F9E188E.80503@googlemail.com> <1335763568.20866.37.camel@pasglop> <20120430.134140.1738751315208907289.davem@davemloft.net> <1335822926.20866.47.camel@pasglop> <1335823049.20866.48.camel@pasglop> <4F9F12ED.1090009@googlemail.com> <1335831987.20866.93.camel@pasglop> <4F9F31E0.5020308@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Seiffert Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F9F31E0.5020308@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 02:44 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote: > But a sane way forward? > > BTW, has anyone checked the new syscall filter code for these ... > misfortunes? > I mean before the ABI is set in stone... > Nope, not yet, looks like something I should do :-) Cheers, Ben.