From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL support for e1000e) Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:42:28 -0700 Message-ID: <1335912148.2656.11.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> References: <4F91DB7B.7060601@candelatech.com> <4FA05153.1010903@candelatech.com> <20120501.174914.654247970871851432.davem@davemloft.net> <4FA05ED2.3030608@candelatech.com> Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oqHZODtgd3afLqXi7f/P" Cc: David Miller , john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, therbert@google.com To: Ben Greear Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:8844 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753633Ab2EAWma (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 18:42:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FA05ED2.3030608@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-oqHZODtgd3afLqXi7f/P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:08 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/01/2012 02:49 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ben Greear > > Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700 > > > >> On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > >>> On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: > >>>> Thanks John for pointers to those. Ben, are you running a kernel > with > >>>> these patches? > >>> > >>> I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine. With these > patches, > >>> I can no longer reproduce the problem. > >>> > >>> So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable! > >> > >> Dave: I think these patches below should go to 3.3 stable. > >> > >> They are not queued for stable yet as far as I can tell. > > > > I let the Intel developers handle -stable submissions for their > > drivers. >=20 > I don't think this is specific to their drivers. >=20 > But, as long as _someone_ is pushing it to stable, > it is fine by me. >=20 > Thanks, > Ben=20 I will take care of the stable submission's Ben. Cheers, Jeff --=-oqHZODtgd3afLqXi7f/P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJPoGbUAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OcAQQAJdcp5DI4c06PPMvuqtaNm5p zBsbkwb3qdvgaII716xncdPa1xLRiCKgA4372U6SdaVbP+QslTd+OnUctD/a3Mv0 o3tv68xRUSLv0ELu5QV6PajLOeE27DJqvE35/0sJvbPzeIlAF9wT2jENKwtZXKHy tZwSJ2Ns8OnhpzHuHAOXqfrUH/xC5QEHp/oOj8sSxvJs+zOXz6v3JnioT/3IG4AR q4S0eld4kFyhgFEGssHN9dAEvAew7UXhbPf56tATzB3hps4ki5b7lB7q5KYqFb+T KoV1bR7JJGFAekASZPy086f2Lvs9DxPc+oMFT0UmDWNv5CpvdiZTAO/f34U1P3/S FZhZcxqcvjHfPIF8CsyQMrSXZh0mIsCtRqCS1UMp3G9jfOeM+AcSMjHmjXybQ/55 tykqHt8ONOgDCaUccOEHm9IL4cBi9/LqG0JKIkfMoBdCFLX2XL1yGq7HFf6kkF34 STteuzntqYSBgkyM/SgBRIHffdwVi30n0kQAQqYIJ7zkKot95Jp9NQTPPjIIwOLh QQ5KXMjUtsBZOnltE3Q9geSu5T5bZ9d0soFopMbGcoF0qYhkfmBDpLDVB6QgtILx kfo+cDCm20U0K94RVU5xKXFad4Bh4FwJyRnOg30jXUwyWscgIBoHpwo0Ar5wLgKC 9ryct8U60kFXMuoyrDXB =YcZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oqHZODtgd3afLqXi7f/P--