From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: "Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
"Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@broadcom.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: take care of cloned skbs in tcp_try_coalesce()
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 03:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336009974.22133.706.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA19F5B.7040407@intel.com>
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 13:55 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 11:15 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 11:05 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >
> >> You're correct about the fragstolen case, I actually was thinking of the
> >> first patch you sent, not this second one.
> >>
> >> However we still have a problem. What we end up with now is a case of
> >> sharing in which the clone skb no longer knows that it is sharing the
> >> head with another skb. The dataref will drop to 1 when we call
> >> __kfree_skb. This means that any other function out there that tries to
> >> see if the skb is shared would return false. This could lead to issues
> >> if there is anything out there that manipulates the data in head based
> >> on the false assumption that it is not cloned. What we would probably
> >> need to do in this case is tweak the logic for skb_cloned. If you are
> >> using a head_frag you should probably add a check that returns true if
> >> cloned is true and page_count is greater than 1. We should be safe in
> >> the case of skb_header_cloned since we already dropped are dataref when
> >> we stole the page and freed the skb.
> > I really dont understand this concern.
> >
> > When skb is cloned, we copy in head_frag __skb_clone()
> >
> > So both skbs have the bit set, and dataref = 2.
> >
> > first skb is freed, dataref becomes 1 and nothing special happen
> >
> > >From this point, skb->head is not 'shared' anymore (taken your own
> > words). And we are free to do whatever we want.
> >
> > second skb is freed, dataref becomes 0 and we call the right destructor.
> The problem is that the stack will not be able to detect sharing. As
> long as page_count is greater than 2 and skb->cloned is set we should be
> telling any callers to skb_cloned that the head is cloned. Otherwise we
> can run into issues elsewhere with well meaning code checking and not
> detecting sharing, and then mangling the header.
>
page count is irrelevant, since if PAGE_SIZE=65536, you can have 32
fragments (of 2048 bytes) per page. Still we can call put_page() for
each individual frag that must be freed.
You forgot to give an example of path that would be failing. Since the
skb_cloned() check is still valid.
Head is cloned if : skb->cloned is set and dataref value is not 1
(minus the skb_header_release() tweaks done on output path for tcp)
Every time a 'caller' is going to modify/mangle its skb head, it must
first call pskb_expand_head() (or various helpers around it) to :
- allocate a new skb->head
- copy old content to new head
- release a reference on old head dataref
- if old dataref reaches 0, 'free' old head (might be a kfree() or
put_page())
> Also I am not sure if the big monolithic changes are really the best way
> to approach this. It would be nice if we could fix this incrementally
> instead of trying to do it all at once since there are multiple issues
> that need to be addressed.
>
> I will try to submit a few patches from my end later today. I still
> need to look over all of the changes from the past couple of weeks that
> were based on the assumption that the IP stack completely owned the skb.
I did my best to provide small changes.
Plus TCP coalescing is done after IP processing.
Owning skb is a vague concept anyway. IP borrows skb but not owns them.
They already could be cloned skb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 10:37 [PATCH 3/4 net-next] net: make GRO aware of skb->head_frag Eric Dumazet
2012-04-30 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-30 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2 " Eric Dumazet
2012-04-30 23:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-01 1:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-01 5:33 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-01 6:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-01 16:17 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-01 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-01 19:45 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 2:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 16:16 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 16:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 17:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 17:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 17:16 ` Rick Jones
2012-05-01 22:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-01 23:10 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 2:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 3:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH net-next] net: take care of cloned skbs in tcp_try_coalesce() Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 15:52 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 16:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 19:58 ` [PATCH net-next] net: implement tcp coalescing in tcp_queue_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 20:11 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-02 20:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 20:34 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-03 0:32 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 1:11 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-03 2:21 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 1:11 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] net: take care of cloned skbs in tcp_try_coalesce() David Miller
2012-05-02 18:05 ` [PATCH " Alexander Duyck
2012-05-02 18:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-02 20:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-03 1:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-05-03 3:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-03 3:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-03 3:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-05-01 1:48 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2 net-next] net: make GRO aware of skb->head_frag David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336009974.22133.706.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox