From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 23:05:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1336341946.8274.228.camel@deadeye> References: <4F9031BF.10106@solarflare.com> <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net> <1335289485.17274.46.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "smhodgson@solarflare.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bruce.w.allan@intel.com" , "decot@google.com" , "alexander.h.duyck@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Miller To: Yaniv Rosner Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 08:02 +0000, Yaniv Rosner wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact > > > Subject line. > > > > > > Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what > > > is different in each of these changes. > > > > > > There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review > > > them? If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it? If not, why not? > > > > Sorry, I've been busy with another project. I'll reply to Stuart's > > patches faster next round. > > > > Ben. > > Hi Stuart, > It's been 3 weeks since you sent the initial patch series which were not > accepted. Please reply if you're going to resubmit fixed patches soon, > otherwise I'll take over, and complete this task from where you left it. I'll be making a pull request including Stuart's patches in the next few days. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.