From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[_64bits]() has no ordering
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:39:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336397946.4325.27.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Neither compare_ether_addr() nor compare_ether_addr_64bits()
(as it can fall back to the former) have comparison semantics
like memcmp() where the sign of the return value indicates sort
order. We had a bug in the wireless code due to a blind memcmp
replacement because of this.
A cursory look suggests that the wireless bug was the only one
due to this semantic difference.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
include/linux/etherdevice.h | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/etherdevice.h 2012-04-12 05:40:35.000000000 +0200
+++ b/include/linux/etherdevice.h 2012-05-07 15:34:28.000000000 +0200
@@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ static inline void eth_hw_addr_random(st
* @addr1: Pointer to a six-byte array containing the Ethernet address
* @addr2: Pointer other six-byte array containing the Ethernet address
*
- * Compare two ethernet addresses, returns 0 if equal
+ * Compare two ethernet addresses, returns 0 if equal, non-zero otherwise.
+ * Unlike memcmp(), it doesn't return a value suitable for sorting.
*/
static inline unsigned compare_ether_addr(const u8 *addr1, const u8 *addr2)
{
@@ -184,10 +185,10 @@ static inline unsigned long zap_last_2by
* @addr1: Pointer to an array of 8 bytes
* @addr2: Pointer to an other array of 8 bytes
*
- * Compare two ethernet addresses, returns 0 if equal.
- * Same result than "memcmp(addr1, addr2, ETH_ALEN)" but without conditional
- * branches, and possibly long word memory accesses on CPU allowing cheap
- * unaligned memory reads.
+ * Compare two ethernet addresses, returns 0 if equal, non-zero otherwise.
+ * Unlike memcmp(), it doesn't return a value suitable for sorting.
+ * The function doesn't need any conditional branches and possibly uses
+ * word memory accesses on CPU allowing cheap unaligned memory reads.
* arrays = { byte1, byte2, byte3, byte4, byte6, byte7, pad1, pad2}
*
* Please note that alignment of addr1 & addr2 is only guaranted to be 16 bits.
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-07 13:39 Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-05-07 13:53 ` [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[_64bits]() has no ordering Eric Dumazet
2012-05-07 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-07 23:20 ` David Miller
2012-05-08 5:25 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-08 6:26 ` David Miller
2012-05-08 6:35 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-08 7:31 ` David Miller
2012-05-08 16:44 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-08 16:44 ` [PATCH] etherdev.h: Convert int is_<foo>_ether_addr to bool Joe Perches
2012-05-08 17:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336397946.4325.27.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).