From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] copy aside frags with destructors (was [PATCH 7/9] net: add skb_orphan_frags to copy aside frags with destructors) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:54:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1336474451.14542.63.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20120508094114.GA14694@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "eric.dumazet@gmail.com" To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:53248 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484Ab2EHKyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 06:54:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120508094114.GA14694@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 10:41 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:53:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > But I fear we're about to toss Ian into yet another rabbit hole. :-) > > > > > > > > > > Let's try to converge on something quickly as I think integration of > > > > > his work has been delayed enough as-is. > > ... > > > Here's a first stub at a fix. Basically to be able to modify frags on > > the fly we must make sure the skb isn't cloned, so the moment someone > > clones the skb we need to trigger the frag copy logic. And this is > > exactly what happens with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY so it seems to make sense > > to reuse that logic. > > > > The below patchset replaces patch 7 > > ([PATCH 7/9] net: add skb_orphan_frags to copy aside frags with destructors) > > in Ian's patchset and needs to be applied there. > > > > > > Compiled only but I'd like to hear what people think all the same > > because it does add a couple of branches on fast path. On the other > > hand this makes it generic so the same logic will be reusable for packet > > sockets (which IIRC are currently buggy in the same way as sunrpc) and > > for adding zero copy support to tun. > > > > Please comment, > > Thanks! > > Ian, just to stress, need your ack that this does what you wanted. Sure, yesterday was a public holiday and today looks likely to be crazy busy. I'll try and have a look later in the week. Ian.