From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: connector: implement cn_netlink_reply Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 01:20:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1336609248.2499.20.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> References: <1336574243-12063-1-git-send-email-alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , , Vincent Sanders , Javier Martinez Canillas , Rodrigo Moya To: Alban Crequy Return-path: Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:64391 "EHLO ocex02.SolarFlarecom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761396Ab2EJAUx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 20:20:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1336574243-12063-1-git-send-email-alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 15:37 +0100, Alban Crequy wrote: > In a connector callback, it was not possible to reply to a message only to a > sender. This patch implements cn_netlink_reply(). It uses the connector socket > to send an unicast netlink message back to the sender. [...] We try to avoid adding functions with no users. You'll need to submit the code that's intended to use this as well. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.