From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar:don't add FCB length to hard_header_len Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:51:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1337975465.30100.4.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <1337677248-27792-1-git-send-email-b06378@freescale.com> <20120522.151830.2018953337014839778.davem@davemloft.net> <4FBE4E02.1070306@computer.org> <1337876210.5070.4.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120525155820.GA25102@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Ceuleers , David Miller , b06378@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:47779 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758474Ab2EYTvG (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2012 15:51:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120525155820.GA25102@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 11:58 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > But you really shouldn't need the hardware to validate this kind of > patch anyways -- aside from your code flow change in the irq routine of > gianfar_ptp, you should have been simply able to check for object file > equivalence before and after your change. No cross compiler either, and I'm lazy 'bout that... cheers, Joe