From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net] e1000e: Change wthresh to 1 to avoid possible Tx stalls. Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 06:24:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1339043085.26966.77.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20120606174355.823e9aa7.shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com> <1339030752.2075.1.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Hiroaki SHIMODA , "davem@davemloft.net" , "denys@visp.net.lb" , "therbert@google.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:43110 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933585Ab2FGEYv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 00:24:51 -0400 Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so45582eaa.19 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:24:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1339030752.2075.1.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > After further internal review, NACK. > > This patch will cause unacceptable performance issues with non-ESB2 > parts. > > I am dropping this patch from my queue. > I'd like you share your performance numbers before NACKing this patch. What is the alternative patch you guys have ?