public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: eilong@broadcom.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
	Robert Evans <evansr@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Yaniv Rosner <yanivr@broadcom.com>,
	Merav Sicron <meravs@broadcom.com>,
	Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: fix checksum validation
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:10:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339596605.22704.363.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339594957.13000.7.camel@lb-tlvb-eilong.il.broadcom.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 16:42 +0300, Eilon Greenstein wrote:

> So what you are saying is that the indication that the checksum is valid
> is interpreted as the encapsulated checksum and not just the IP
> header... This was not the intention of this code, it was meant to
> indicate that the IP header is valid.
> 

IP header is always checked by our stack.

Its so fast that there is no point spending a bit in skb, and testing
this bit.

Yes, CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY really means everything was checked up to L4

> I must admit that the code looks much better with this change. The only
> down side is that there is no longer IP checksum offload for pure IP
> packets, but that's negligible. The only thing that bothers me is that
> there is no way to indicate anything about the encapsulated packet
> separately from the outer header. Is that the way we want to keep it?

Some NIC allow for csum L3 offloading, providing the 16bit csum.

We then can :

skb->csum = csum;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;

Check drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c,
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/skge.c ,
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/sky2.c , ... for examples.


When a layer is removed(pulled), we can use skb_postpull_rcsum() and
friends (check net/ipv4/ip_gre.c for example) to keep skb->csum up2date.


If bnx2x provides this csum (for non TCP/UCP packets or fragments), you
could fallback to this CHECKSUM_COMPLETE stuff.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-13 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-13  9:50 [PATCH] bnx2x: fix checksum validation Eric Dumazet
2012-06-13 13:42 ` Eilon Greenstein
2012-06-13 14:10   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-06-13 14:21     ` Eilon Greenstein
2012-06-13 22:59       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339596605.22704.363.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
    --cc=evansr@google.com \
    --cc=meravs@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yanivr@broadcom.com \
    --cc=yuvalmin@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox