From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on TX throughput when using bonding
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:29:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339684157.22704.722.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL8zT=huqtqBKzH3DDwid_C8jH16SH=kjYEK6zjxp_spfnLxXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 16:14 +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> ~# tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth1 > before_tc && sleep 10 && tc -s -d
> qdisc show dev eth1 > after_tc && ./beforeafter before_tc after_tc
> qdisc mq 0: root
> Sent 3185900568 bytes 788681 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 620)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 620
>
> As you can see, 2.5Gbps without any difficulties :).
>
> Thanks,
> JM
I have no idea why throughput on ethernet link is changed.
There is another bug elsewhere. Use a thousand of sockets instead of
few, and you'll hit the bug.
Orphaning skbs should not lower speed of the device, only drops excess
packets, instead of blocking the application, waiting the socket wmem
alloc being freed by destructors.
Are you playing with process priorities ?
If the ksoftirqd cannot run, this could explain the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 8:58 Regression on TX throughput when using bonding Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 9:40 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 9:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 10:00 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 10:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-14 10:31 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 16:42 ` [PATCH] net: remove skb_orphan_try() Eric Dumazet
2012-06-15 7:15 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-06-15 22:31 ` David Miller
2012-06-14 10:15 ` Regression on TX throughput when using bonding Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 14:14 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 14:29 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-06-14 15:43 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2012-06-14 17:46 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339684157.22704.722.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhautbois@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox