From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:23:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1340079813.7491.2164.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20120618.194016.2282814982594761206.davem@davemloft.net> <1340078846.7491.2127.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120618.211539.105938285016510975.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:64240 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742Ab2FSEXi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:23:38 -0400 Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so1805905eaa.19 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:23:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120618.211539.105938285016510975.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 21:15 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:07:26 +0200 > > > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 19:40 -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> You know you want it. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > > > > Yeah, very good idea David ;) > > > > needs some polishing of course. > > Such as? IPv6 support? > I was referring to socket leak in : + if (sk) { + skb->sk = sk; + skb->destructor = sock_edemux; + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_TIME_WAIT) { + struct dst_entry *dst = sk->sk_rx_dst; + if (dst) { + skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst); + err = 0; + } + } + }