Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: greearb@candelatech.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@ixiacom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] TCP:  Support configurable delayed-ack parameters.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:11:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340082688.7491.2299.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340067163-29329-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com>

On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:52 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> 
> RFC2581 ($4.2) specifies when an ACK should be generated as follows:
> 
> " .. an ACK SHOULD be generated for at least every second
>   full-sized segment, and MUST be generated within 500 ms
>   of the arrival of the first unacknowledged packet.
> "
> 
> We export the number of segments and the timeout limits
> specified above, so that a user can tune them according
> to their needs.
> 
> Specifically:
> 	* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_delack_segs, represents
> 	the threshold for the number of segments.
> 	* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_delack_min, specifies
> 	the minimum timeout value
> 	* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_delack_max, specifies
> 	the maximum timeout value.
> 
> In addition, new TCP socket options are added to allow
> per-socket configuration:
> 
> TCP_DELACK_SEGS
> TCP_DELACK_MIN
> TCP_DELACK_MAX
> 
> In order to keep a multiply out of the hot path, the segs * mss
> computation is recalculated and cached whenever segs or mss changes.
> 

I know David was worried about this multiply, but current cpus do a
multiply in at most 3 cycles.

Addding an u32 field in socket structure adds 1/16 of a cache line, and
adds more penalty.

Avoiding to build/send an ACK packet can save us so many cpu cycles that
the multiply is pure noise.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-19  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19  0:52 [RFC] TCP: Support configurable delayed-ack parameters greearb
2012-06-19  1:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-06-19  2:46   ` Ben Greear
2012-06-19  5:11 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-06-19 16:11   ` Ben Greear
2012-06-19 21:21     ` David Miller
2012-06-19 21:27       ` Ben Greear
2012-06-21 16:04   ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340082688.7491.2299.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=dbaluta@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox