From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:28:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1340087297.7491.2458.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1340079938.7491.2172.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120618.212721.2148947025741866390.davem@davemloft.net> <1340080661.7491.2205.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120618.230723.612232275251003129.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:54925 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785Ab2FSG2W (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:28:22 -0400 Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so1822176eaa.19 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120618.230723.612232275251003129.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 23:07 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Sure thing. > > We also need to add some dst->ops->check() handling as well. Yes, rp_filter comes to mind.