Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux.
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:49:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340171359.4604.794.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120619.214657.1345825814176201681.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:46 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:35:49 -0700
> 
> > Any benchmark numbers?
> 
> Measuring the path from ip_rcv_finish() to where we lock the socket in
> tcp_v4_rcv(), on a SPARC-T3, with a pre-warmed routing cache:
> 
> Both sk and RT lookup:	~4200 cycles
> Optimized early demux:	~2800 cycles
> 
> These numbers can be decreased further, because since we're already
> looking at the TCP header we can pre-cook the TCP control block in the
> SKB and skip much of the stuff that tcp_v4_rcv() does since we've done
> it already in the early demux code.
> 
> > I think the number of ref count operations per packet is going to be
> > the next line in the sand.
> 
> There is only one, for the socket.  We haven't taken a reference on the
> route for years.

Actually this patch makes things probably slower for :

1) routers :

Each incoming tcp packet has to perform lookups 
(ESTABLISHED and TIMEWAIT), adding one cache miss

2) small lived tcp sessions

   input dst is now dirtied because of the additional
dst_clone()/dst_release()


1) can be solved using a knob as suggested by Changli, possibly using a
JUMP_LABEL shadowing ip_forward ?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 23:39 [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux David Miller
2012-06-20  0:21 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-20  0:54   ` David Miller
2012-06-20  1:03     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-20  1:05       ` David Miller
2012-06-20  2:02         ` David Miller
2012-06-20 18:16           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-20  2:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-06-20  4:46   ` David Miller
2012-06-20  5:49     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-06-20  5:51       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20  6:14         ` David Miller
2012-06-20 16:21           ` Rick Jones
2012-06-20  5:59     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20  6:14       ` David Miller
2012-06-20 10:15         ` David Miller
2012-06-20 11:03           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 11:09             ` David Miller
2012-06-20 12:38           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 22:29             ` David Miller
2012-06-20 18:07       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-20 18:40         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 21:01           ` David Miller
2012-06-20 21:04             ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-06-20 21:17               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-20 21:26                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340171359.4604.794.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox