From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: 10GBE performance drop with net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:47:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1340185645.4604.853.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <4FE0EA33.1000309@profihost.ag> <1340141493.4604.773.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE17522.5050005@profihost.ag> <1340176940.4604.801.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE1881B.7030800@profihost.ag> <1340181676.4604.838.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE192A1.6000000@profihost.ag> <4FE193FA.5030802@profihost.ag> <1340183854.4604.847.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE196F4.3040900@profihost.ag> <1340184528.4604.849.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FE198FE.5050202@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Netdev List To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:39333 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755881Ab2FTJr3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:47:29 -0400 Received: by bkcji2 with SMTP id ji2so5962054bkc.19 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FE198FE.5050202@profihost.ag> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:33 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Sure. In that case i get 4Gbit/s in both variants. I also tried two > other different machines same result. > So 3.5 on receiver is the problem, it seems ? And you checked all the stuff about irq affinities, i presume, since a lot of things might have changed between 2.6.32 and 3.5 ? cat /proc/interrupts what kind of NIC it is ?