Re: [net-next.git 4/4 (v7)] phy: add the EEE support and the way to access to the MMD registers.

[Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>]

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:12 +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
[...]
> +int phy_init_eee(struct phy_device *phydev, bool clk_stop_enable)
> +{
> +	int ret = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> +
> +	/* According to 802.3az,the EEE is supported only in full duplex-mode.
> +	 * Also EEE feature is active when core is operating with MII, GMII
> +	 * or RGMII.
> +	 */
> +	if ((phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL) &&
> +	    ((phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII) ||
> +	    (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII) ||
> +	    (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII))) {
> +		u16 eee_lp, eee_cap, eee_adv;
> +		u32 lp, cap, adv;
> +		int idx;
> +
> +		/* Read phy status to properly get the right settings */
> +		ret = phy_read_status(phydev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		/* First check if the EEE ability is supported */
> +		eee_cap = phy_read_mmd_indirect(phydev->bus, MDIO_PCS_EEE_ABLE,
> +						MDIO_MMD_PCS, phydev->addr);
> +		if (eee_cap < 0)
> +			return eee_cap;
> +
> +		cap = phy_eee_to_supported(eee_cap);
> +		if (!cap)
> +			goto eee_exit;

But this now means returning 0 since you added the call to
phy_read_status() above.  Maybe you should just return -EPROTONOSUPPORT
directly instead of relying on the assumed value of ret?

> +		/* Check which link settings negotiated and verify it in
> +		 * the EEE advertising registers.
> +		 */
> +		eee_lp = phy_read_mmd_indirect(phydev->bus, MDIO_AN_EEE_LPABLE,
> +					       MDIO_MMD_AN, phydev->addr);
> +		if (eee_lp < 0)
> +			return eee_lp;
> +
> +		eee_adv = phy_read_mmd_indirect(phydev->bus, MDIO_AN_EEE_ADV,
> +						MDIO_MMD_AN, phydev->addr);
> +		if (eee_adv < 0)
> +			return eee_adv;
> +
> +		adv = phy_eee_to_adv(eee_adv);
> +		lp = phy_eee_to_adv(eee_lp);
> +		idx = phy_find_setting(phydev->speed, phydev->duplex);
> +		if ((lp & adv & settings[idx].setting))
> +			goto eee_exit;
[...]

Same problem here.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.