From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux. Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:40:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1340217604.4604.1569.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20120619.163911.2094057156011157978.davem@davemloft.net> <20120619193549.13bcffa7@s6510.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120619.214657.1345825814176201681.davem@davemloft.net> <1340171940.4604.799.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1340215664.2576.12.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:52733 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757638Ab2FTSkJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:40:09 -0400 Received: by bkcji2 with SMTP id ji2so6522777bkc.19 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1340215664.2576.12.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:07 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I don't know what you mean by 'have no use'. It's enabled anyway, and I > would expect that it's beneficial for some smaller routers. > I believe vast majority of linux powered devices are more hosts, not routers (ip_forward default value is 0 by the way) If someone wants to tune its linux router, he probably already disables GRO because of various issues with too big packets. GRO adds a significant cost to forwarding path.