netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com,
	subramanian.vijay@gmail.com, dave.taht@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com,
	therbert@google.com, mph@hoth.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:24:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340781845.2028.133.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120626.235423.588696200884989114.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 23:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:32:13 +0200
> 
> > Using it as default, might be "dangerous" and open an attack vector
> > on SYN cookies in Linux.
> 
> If it's dangerous for syncookies then it's just as dangerous for
> the routing hash and the socket hashes where we use it already.
> 
> Therefore, this sounds like a baseless claim to me.

Yes, you are right. Looking at you patch again, you also use
syncookie_secret[c] as initval.  So, it should be safe.

But, I still believe that we need, to solve this SYN issues by parallel
processing of packets. (It seems Eric and Hans are looking at a single
core SYN processing scheme, but I might have missed their point).

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-27  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-31 21:56 [PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets Eric Dumazet
2012-05-31 23:03 ` David Miller
2012-06-01  4:48   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-01 17:46     ` David Miller
2012-06-01  7:00 ` [PATCH] tcp: do not create inetpeer on SYNACK message Eric Dumazet
2012-06-01 18:24   ` David Miller
2012-06-01 21:34   ` Hans Schillström
2012-06-02  6:56     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-01  7:36 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-01  9:34   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-02  1:28 ` Dave Taht
2012-06-02  5:46   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-23  7:34     ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-06-23  8:42       ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2012-06-25  6:24         ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-25 22:43         ` David Miller
2012-06-26  4:51           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-26  4:55             ` David Miller
2012-06-26  5:34               ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-26  7:11                 ` David Miller
2012-06-26  7:27                   ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-26 17:02                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27  5:23                   ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-27  8:22                     ` David Miller
2012-06-27  8:25                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-06-27  8:30                       ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-06-27  8:40                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27  8:48                         ` David Miller
2012-06-27  6:32                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-06-27  6:54                     ` David Miller
2012-06-27  7:24                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2012-06-27  7:30                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27  7:54                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-06-27  8:02                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27  8:21                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-06-27  8:45                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27  9:23                                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-06-27  8:13                           ` David Miller
2012-06-27 19:50                       ` Florian Westphal
2012-06-27 21:39                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-27 22:23                           ` David Miller
2012-06-27 22:23                         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340781845.2028.133.camel@localhost \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mph@hoth.dk \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=subramanian.vijay@gmail.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).