* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Richard Gobert
@ 2023-07-07 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-07-10 14:54 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-07 18:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2023-07-07 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Gobert
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, willemdebruijn.kernel, dsahern, tom, netdev,
linux-kernel, gal
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:26 PM Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a misuse of IP{6}CB(skb) in GRO, while calling to
> `udp6_lib_lookup2` when handling udp tunnels. `udp6_lib_lookup2` fetch the
> device from CB. The fix changes it to fetch the device from `skb->dev`.
> l3mdev case requires special attention since it has a master and a slave
> device.
>
> Fixes: a6024562ffd7 ("udp: Add GRO functions to UDP socket")
> Reported-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/udp.h | 2 ++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> net/ipv6/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index 4d13424f8f72..48af1479882f 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ int udp_lib_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> int udp_lib_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen,
> int (*push_pending_frames)(struct sock *));
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> __be32 daddr, __be16 dport, int dif);
> struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> int dif);
> +void udp6_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *__udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 42a96b3547c9..0581ab184afd 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -550,15 +550,32 @@ static inline struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> inet_sdif(skb), udptable, skb);
> }
>
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif)
> +{
> + *iif = inet_iif(skb) || skb->dev->ifindex;
This looks wrong. Did you mean
*iif = inet_iif(skb) ?: skb->dev->ifindex;
> + *sdif = 0;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> + *sdif = *iif;
> + *iif = master ? master->ifindex : 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be16 sport, __be16 dport)
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp4_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp4_lib_lookup(net, iph->saddr, sport,
> - iph->daddr, dport, inet_iif(skb),
> - inet_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> /* Must be called under rcu_read_lock().
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> index 75aa4de5b731..70d760b271db 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> @@ -603,10 +603,13 @@ static struct sock *udp4_gro_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 sport,
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp4_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp4_lib_lookup(net, iph->saddr, sport,
> - iph->daddr, dport, inet_iif(skb),
> - inet_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> index 317b01c9bc39..aac9b20d67e4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> @@ -294,15 +294,32 @@ static struct sock *__udp6_lib_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> inet6_sdif(skb), udptable, skb);
> }
>
> +void udp6_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif)
> +{
> + *iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
ipv6_rcv() inits
IP6CB(skb)->iif = skb_dst(skb) ?
ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb))->dev->ifindex : dev->ifindex;
You chose to always use skb->dev->ifindex instead ?
You might add a comment why it is okay.
> + *sdif = 0;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> + *sdif = *iif;
> + *iif = master ? master->ifindex : 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be16 sport, __be16 dport)
> {
> const struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp6_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp6_lib_lookup(net, &iph->saddr, sport,
> - &iph->daddr, dport, inet6_iif(skb),
> - inet6_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + &iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> /* Must be called under rcu_read_lock().
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> index ad3b8726873e..88191d79002e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,13 @@ static struct sock *udp6_gro_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 sport,
> {
> const struct ipv6hdr *iph = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp6_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp6_lib_lookup(net, &iph->saddr, sport,
> - &iph->daddr, dport, inet6_iif(skb),
> - inet6_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + &iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> --
> 2.36.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2023-07-10 14:54 ` Richard Gobert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Richard Gobert @ 2023-07-10 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, willemdebruijn.kernel, dsahern, tom, netdev,
linux-kernel, gal
Thanks, I will send a v2 with the fixes.
> ipv6_rcv() inits
>
> IP6CB(skb)->iif = skb_dst(skb) ?
> ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb))->dev->ifindex : dev->ifindex;
>
> You chose to always use skb->dev->ifindex instead ?
>
> You might add a comment why it is okay.
It looks like this assignment ("ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb))->dev->ifindex")
is relevant only in case of sending traffic on loopback.
It does not seem relevant in GRO stack.
That is why I chose to use only the `skb->dev->ifindex` part.
Do you think that's correct?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-07-07 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2023-07-07 18:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-07-07 21:40 ` David Ahern
2023-07-17 10:41 ` Gal Pressman
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2023-07-07 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richardbgobert
Cc: davem, dsahern, edumazet, gal, kuba, linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni,
tom, willemdebruijn.kernel, kuniyu
From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:26:28 +0200
> This patch fixes a misuse of IP{6}CB(skb) in GRO, while calling to
> `udp6_lib_lookup2` when handling udp tunnels. `udp6_lib_lookup2` fetch the
> device from CB. The fix changes it to fetch the device from `skb->dev`.
> l3mdev case requires special attention since it has a master and a slave
> device.
>
> Fixes: a6024562ffd7 ("udp: Add GRO functions to UDP socket")
> Reported-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/udp.h | 2 ++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> net/ipv6/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index 4d13424f8f72..48af1479882f 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ int udp_lib_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> int udp_lib_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen,
> int (*push_pending_frames)(struct sock *));
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> __be32 daddr, __be16 dport, int dif);
> struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> int dif);
> +void udp6_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *__udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 42a96b3547c9..0581ab184afd 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -550,15 +550,32 @@ static inline struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> inet_sdif(skb), udptable, skb);
> }
>
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif)
> +{
> + *iif = inet_iif(skb) || skb->dev->ifindex;
> + *sdif = 0;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
nit: blank line here for checkpatch.
> + *sdif = *iif;
> + *iif = master ? master->ifindex : 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be16 sport, __be16 dport)
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp4_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp4_lib_lookup(net, iph->saddr, sport,
> - iph->daddr, dport, inet_iif(skb),
> - inet_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> /* Must be called under rcu_read_lock().
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> index 75aa4de5b731..70d760b271db 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> @@ -603,10 +603,13 @@ static struct sock *udp4_gro_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 sport,
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp4_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp4_lib_lookup(net, iph->saddr, sport,
> - iph->daddr, dport, inet_iif(skb),
> - inet_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> index 317b01c9bc39..aac9b20d67e4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> @@ -294,15 +294,32 @@ static struct sock *__udp6_lib_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> inet6_sdif(skb), udptable, skb);
> }
>
> +void udp6_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif)
> +{
> + *iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> + *sdif = 0;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
Same here.
> + *sdif = *iif;
> + *iif = master ? master->ifindex : 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be16 sport, __be16 dport)
> {
> const struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp6_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp6_lib_lookup(net, &iph->saddr, sport,
> - &iph->daddr, dport, inet6_iif(skb),
> - inet6_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + &iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> /* Must be called under rcu_read_lock().
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> index ad3b8726873e..88191d79002e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,13 @@ static struct sock *udp6_gro_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 sport,
> {
> const struct ipv6hdr *iph = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + udp6_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
>
> return __udp6_lib_lookup(net, &iph->saddr, sport,
> - &iph->daddr, dport, inet6_iif(skb),
> - inet6_sdif(skb), net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> + &iph->daddr, dport, iif,
> + sdif, net->ipv4.udp_table, NULL);
> }
>
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> --
> 2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Richard Gobert
2023-07-07 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-07-07 18:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2023-07-07 21:40 ` David Ahern
2023-07-10 14:58 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-17 10:41 ` Gal Pressman
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2023-07-07 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Gobert, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
willemdebruijn.kernel, tom, netdev, linux-kernel, gal
On 7/7/23 6:26 AM, Richard Gobert wrote:
> This patch fixes a misuse of IP{6}CB(skb) in GRO, while calling to
> `udp6_lib_lookup2` when handling udp tunnels. `udp6_lib_lookup2` fetch the
> device from CB. The fix changes it to fetch the device from `skb->dev`.
> l3mdev case requires special attention since it has a master and a slave
> device.
put your cover letter details in here; no need for a cover letter for a
single patch.
>
> Fixes: a6024562ffd7 ("udp: Add GRO functions to UDP socket")
> Reported-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/udp.h | 2 ++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> net/ipv6/udp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 7 +++++--
> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index 4d13424f8f72..48af1479882f 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ int udp_lib_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> int udp_lib_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen,
> int (*push_pending_frames)(struct sock *));
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> __be32 daddr, __be16 dport, int dif);
> struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> int dif);
> +void udp6_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif);
> struct sock *__udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net,
> const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
> const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 42a96b3547c9..0581ab184afd 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -550,15 +550,32 @@ static inline struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> inet_sdif(skb), udptable, skb);
> }
>
> +void udp4_get_iif_sdif(const struct sk_buff *skb, int *iif, int *sdif)
> +{
> + *iif = inet_iif(skb) || skb->dev->ifindex;
> + *sdif = 0;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
> + if (netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> + *sdif = *iif;
> + *iif = master ? master->ifindex : 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
there are existing iif and sdif lookup functions. I believe this gro
path needs a different version, but it should have a comment of when it
can be used vs the existing ones. Also, it is small enough to be an
inline like the existing ones. e.g., see inet_sdif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 21:40 ` David Ahern
@ 2023-07-10 14:58 ` Richard Gobert
2023-07-10 15:50 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Richard Gobert @ 2023-07-10 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, willemdebruijn.kernel, tom, netdev,
linux-kernel, gal
> put your cover letter details in here; no need for a cover letter for a
> single patch.
I believe some details are irrelevant to the bugfix itself,
I prefer to avoid overloading the commit message...
Do you think there is a specific part of the cover letter that
should be added to the commit message?
> there are existing iif and sdif lookup functions. I believe this gro
> path needs a different version, but it should have a comment of when it
> can be used vs the existing ones. Also, it is small enough to be an
> inline like the existing ones. e.g., see inet_sdif
I was under the impression the coding style of Linux does not
encourage placing the inline keyword.
In which cases do you think I should add it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-10 14:58 ` Richard Gobert
@ 2023-07-10 15:50 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2023-07-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Gobert
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, willemdebruijn.kernel, tom, netdev,
linux-kernel, gal
On 7/10/23 8:58 AM, Richard Gobert wrote:
>> put your cover letter details in here; no need for a cover letter for a
>> single patch.
>
> I believe some details are irrelevant to the bugfix itself,
> I prefer to avoid overloading the commit message...
> Do you think there is a specific part of the cover letter that
> should be added to the commit message?
>
>> there are existing iif and sdif lookup functions. I believe this gro
>> path needs a different version, but it should have a comment of when it
>> can be used vs the existing ones. Also, it is small enough to be an
>> inline like the existing ones. e.g., see inet_sdif
>
> I was under the impression the coding style of Linux does not
> encourage placing the inline keyword.
> In which cases do you think I should add it?
See the existing *_sdif helpers in include/net/ip.h,
include/linux/ipv6.h and include/net/tcp.h.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-07 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Richard Gobert
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-07 21:40 ` David Ahern
@ 2023-07-17 10:41 ` Gal Pressman
2023-07-19 7:27 ` Richard Gobert
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gal Pressman @ 2023-07-17 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Gobert, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
willemdebruijn.kernel, dsahern, tom, netdev, linux-kernel
On 07/07/2023 15:26, Richard Gobert wrote:
> This patch fixes a misuse of IP{6}CB(skb) in GRO, while calling to
> `udp6_lib_lookup2` when handling udp tunnels. `udp6_lib_lookup2` fetch the
> device from CB. The fix changes it to fetch the device from `skb->dev`.
> l3mdev case requires special attention since it has a master and a slave
> device.
>
> Fixes: a6024562ffd7 ("udp: Add GRO functions to UDP socket")
> Reported-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Hi Richard,
Are you planning to submit a v2 for this patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup
2023-07-17 10:41 ` Gal Pressman
@ 2023-07-19 7:27 ` Richard Gobert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Richard Gobert @ 2023-07-19 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gal Pressman
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, willemdebruijn.kernel, dsahern,
tom, netdev, linux-kernel
Hi Gal,
Yes, I'm planning to implement all the fixes and submit a v2 in the next few days.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread