From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlegacy: print how long queue was actually stuck
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:53:09 +0200
Message-ID: <1341222789.1911.145.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
References: <1340786187.1911.24.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
	 <1341062406.1911.76.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
	 <20120702090602.GA8286@redhat.com>
	 <1341221563.1911.141.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
	 <20120702093913.GA9045@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120702093913.GA9045@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 11:39 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Oh, you were not CCed, and lkml too, v2 patch is here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134121823510017&w=2

Thanks.

> > Should I report whether the iwlegacy version works
> > or not?
> Actually I'll post it anyway. But if this patch and Emmanuel's will not 
> fix the problem you should report it. 

I'll try to report any oddities I notice.

> > Any thoughts on my patch (ie, the patch that is actually the subject of
> > this thread?
> It was applied to wireless-testing.

That's nice.


Paul Bolle