From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, edumazet@google.com,
bhutchings@solarflare.com, therbert@google.com,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add new network device function to allow for MMIO batching
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:38:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342165129.3265.8320.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFEEF99.7030707@intel.com>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:39 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> The problem is in both of the cases where I have seen the issue the
> qdisc is actually empty.
>
You mean a router workload, with links of same bandwidth.
(BQL doesnt trigger)
Frankly what percentage of linux powered machines act as high perf
routers ?
> In the case of pktgen it does not use the qdisc layer at all. It just
> directly calls ndo_start_xmit.
pktgen is in kernel, adding a complete() call in it is certainly ok,
if we can avoid kernel bloat.
I mean, pktgen represents less than 0.000001 % of real workloads.
>
> In the standard networking case we never fill the qdisc because the MMIO
> write stalls the entire CPU so the application never gets a chance to
> get ahead of the hardware. From what I can tell the only case in which
> the qdisc_run solution would work is if the ndo_start_xmit was called on
> a different CPU from the application that is doing the transmitting.
Hey, I can tell that qdisc is not empty on many workloads.
But BQL and TSO mean we only send one or two packets per qdisc run.
I understand this MMIO batching helps routers workloads, or workloads
using many small packets.
But on other workloads, this adds a significant latency source
(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ)
It would be good to instrument the extra delay on a single UDP send.
(entering do_softirq() path is not a few instructions...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-13 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 0:25 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Coalesce MMIO writes for transmits Alexander Duyck
2012-07-12 0:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add new network device function to allow for MMIO batching Alexander Duyck
2012-07-12 7:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 15:39 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-07-13 7:38 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-07-13 15:37 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-07-13 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-07-13 16:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-13 7:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-13 15:49 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-07-13 16:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 0:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: Add functionality for delaying the MMIO write for Tx Alexander Duyck
2012-07-12 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Coalesce MMIO writes for transmits Stephen Hemminger
2012-07-12 19:01 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342165129.3265.8320.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox