From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Use pr_fmt Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:04:33 -0700 Message-ID: <1342206273.626.0.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <1342111201-9426-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1342115481.13046.5.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120713154544.GA31280@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jon Maloy , Erik Hugne , ying.xue@windriver.com To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:49425 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933498Ab2GMTEo (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:04:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120713154544.GA31280@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 11:45 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [[PATCH net-next] tipc: Use pr_fmt] On 12/07/2012 (Thu 10:51) Joe Perches wrote: > > How about extending this to use the more common pr_fmt prefix? > We can probably do that. I'll incorporate that into the 3/8 patch, > rather than have two similar patches in the series, with the 2nd just > going in and touching all the same lines a second time. Hi Paul, that sounds fine to me, cheers, Joe