From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rostislav Lisovy Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v2 0/3] CAN Filter/Classifier Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:09:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1343398165.12164.3.camel@lolumad> References: <1343383363-6174-1-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> <50129E17.7030602@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, lartc@vger.kernel.org, pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz, sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz To: Oliver Hartkopp Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54305 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751859Ab2G0OJ3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:09:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <50129E17.7030602@hartkopp.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:56 +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 27.07.2012 12:02, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > > I'm reposting Rostislav's iproute2 patches, as Stephen requested, > > during the v3.6 merge window with the corresponding kernel patches > > already applied. > > > Btw. i think these patches address the original implementation from Rostislav > using the CAN classifier. The review lead to a completely new implementation > using ematch. Therefore this patch series is outdated AFAICS. > > @Rostislav: Am i correct here? Hello Oliver; You are right -- these are the patches for the old "standalone can filter/classifier" implementation. I will send correct patches hopefully on Monday/Tuesday. Regards; Rostislav