netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev()
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:38:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343403484-29347-8-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343403484-29347-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>

This patch fixes several problems in the call path of
netpoll_send_skb_on_dev():

1. We already disable IRQ's before calling netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(),
   so we don't need to disable IRQ's again.
2. All the callees of netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() should use
   rcu_dereference_bh() to dereference ->npinfo.
3. Rename arp_reply() to netpoll_arp_reply(), the former is too generic.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
 net/core/netpoll.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 3965fdb..d6e192b 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static atomic_t trapped;
 	 MAX_UDP_CHUNK)
 
 static void zap_completion_queue(void);
-static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb);
+static void netpoll_arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo);
 
 static unsigned int carrier_timeout = 4;
 module_param(carrier_timeout, uint, 0644);
@@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
 	list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
 		if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
 		    spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) {
-			budget = poll_one_napi(dev->npinfo, napi, budget);
+			budget = poll_one_napi(rcu_dereference_bh(dev->npinfo),
+					       napi, budget);
 			spin_unlock(&napi->poll_lock);
 
 			if (!budget)
@@ -185,13 +186,14 @@ static void service_arp_queue(struct netpoll_info *npi)
 		struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 		while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&npi->arp_tx)))
-			arp_reply(skb);
+			netpoll_arp_reply(skb, npi);
 	}
 }
 
 static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	const struct net_device_ops *ops;
+	struct netpoll_info *ni = rcu_dereference_bh(dev->npinfo);
 
 	if (!dev || !netif_running(dev))
 		return;
@@ -206,17 +208,18 @@ static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 	poll_napi(dev);
 
 	if (dev->flags & IFF_SLAVE) {
-		if (dev->npinfo) {
+		if (ni) {
 			struct net_device *bond_dev = dev->master;
 			struct sk_buff *skb;
-			while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&dev->npinfo->arp_tx))) {
+			struct netpoll_info *bond_ni = rcu_dereference_bh(bond_dev->npinfo);
+			while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ni->arp_tx))) {
 				skb->dev = bond_dev;
-				skb_queue_tail(&bond_dev->npinfo->arp_tx, skb);
+				skb_queue_tail(&bond_ni->arp_tx, skb);
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	service_arp_queue(dev->npinfo);
+	service_arp_queue(ni);
 
 	zap_completion_queue();
 }
@@ -302,6 +305,7 @@ static int netpoll_owner_active(struct net_device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* call with IRQ disabled */
 void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			     struct net_device *dev)
 {
@@ -309,8 +313,11 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	unsigned long tries;
 	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
 	/* It is up to the caller to keep npinfo alive. */
-	struct netpoll_info *npinfo = np->dev->npinfo;
+	struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
 
+	npinfo = rcu_dereference_bh(np->dev->npinfo);
 	if (!npinfo || !netif_running(dev) || !netif_device_present(dev)) {
 		__kfree_skb(skb);
 		return;
@@ -319,11 +326,9 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	/* don't get messages out of order, and no recursion */
 	if (skb_queue_len(&npinfo->txq) == 0 && !netpoll_owner_active(dev)) {
 		struct netdev_queue *txq;
-		unsigned long flags;
 
 		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
 
-		local_irq_save(flags);
 		/* try until next clock tick */
 		for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL;
 		     tries > 0; --tries) {
@@ -347,10 +352,9 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		}
 
 		WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),
-			"netpoll_send_skb(): %s enabled interrupts in poll (%pF)\n",
+			"netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(): %s enabled interrupts in poll (%pF)\n",
 			dev->name, ops->ndo_start_xmit);
 
-		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 
 	if (status != NETDEV_TX_OK) {
@@ -423,9 +427,8 @@ void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np, const char *msg, int len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_send_udp);
 
-static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static void netpoll_arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
 {
-	struct netpoll_info *npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
 	struct arphdr *arp;
 	unsigned char *arp_ptr;
 	int size, type = ARPOP_REPLY, ptype = ETH_P_ARP;
-- 
1.7.7.6

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-27 15:37 [PATCH 0/7] netpoll and netconsole fixes for 3.6 Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() Cong Wang
2012-08-03  9:17   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-03  9:34     ` Cong Wang
2012-08-03 10:10       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-06  9:08         ` Cong Wang
2012-08-06  9:44           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-06 12:31             ` Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] netpoll: make __netpoll_cleanup non-block Cong Wang
2012-07-27 18:40   ` Neil Horman
2012-07-30  1:42     ` Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] netconsole: do not release spin_lock before calling __netpoll_cleanup Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] bridge: call NETDEV_RELEASE notifier in br_del_if() Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-07-30  1:59     ` Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_rx() Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] netpoll: use netpoll_rx_on() " Cong Wang
2012-07-27 15:38 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-01  2:22 ` [PATCH 0/7] netpoll and netconsole fixes for 3.6 Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1343403484-29347-8-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).