From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, carolyn.wyborny@intel.com,
sassmann@kpanic.de
Subject: [PATCH net-next] igb: add delay to allow igb loopback test to succeed on 8086:10c9
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:44:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343821463-18052-1-git-send-email-sassmann@kpanic.de> (raw)
Some 8086:10c9 NICs have a problem completing the ethtool loopback test.
The result looks like this:
ethtool -t eth1
The test result is FAIL
The test extra info:
Register test (offline) 0
Eeprom test (offline) 0
Interrupt test (offline) 0
Loopback test (offline) 13
Link test (on/offline) 0
A bisect clearly points to commit a95a07445ee97a2fef65befafbadcc30ca1bd145.
However that seems to only trigger the bug. While adding some printk the
problem disappeared, so this might be a timing issue. After some trial and
error I discovered that adding a small delay just before igb_write_phy_reg()
in igb_integrated_phy_loopback() allows the loopback test to succeed.
I was unable to figure out the root cause so far but I expect it to be
somewhere in the following executing path
igb_integrated_phy_loopback
->igb_write_phy_reg_igp
->igb_write_phy_reg_mdic
->igb_acquire_phy_82575
->igb_acquire_swfw_sync_82575
As this workaround only introduces a minor delay, which is not in the hot
path I hope this is acceptable. The problem could only be oberved on
8086:10c9 NICs so far and not all of them show the behaviour. I did not
restrict the workaround to this type of NIC as it should do no harm to
other igb NICs.
With the patch below the loopback test succeeded 500 times in a row
using a NIC that would otherwise fail.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
index a19c84c..f62fa25 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
@@ -1497,6 +1497,9 @@ static int igb_integrated_phy_loopback(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
break;
}
+ /* add small delay to avoid loopback test failure */
+ msleep(50);
+
/* force 1000, set loopback */
igb_write_phy_reg(hw, PHY_CONTROL, 0x4140);
--
1.7.4.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-01 11:44 Stefan Assmann [this message]
2012-08-01 14:56 ` [PATCH net-next] igb: add delay to allow igb loopback test to succeed on 8086:10c9 Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-08-02 1:06 ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343821463-18052-1-git-send-email-sassmann@kpanic.de \
--to=sassmann@kpanic.de \
--cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).