From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: reduce Rx header size Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:52:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1343922767.9299.234.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1342912142-11130-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1342912142-11130-8-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1343920538.9299.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <501AA00E.3010400@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Kirsher , netdev , "Wyborny, Carolyn" To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:36151 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753055Ab2HBPwv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:52:51 -0400 Received: by eeil10 with SMTP id l10so2440834eei.19 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <501AA00E.3010400@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 08:43 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > Would there be any problems with us running this through Jeff's tree for > testing prior to applying this? I'm just wanting to do some testing > internally for any performance regressions due to this change. Sure, I was expecting this exactly, sorry if it was not clear. ( by the way, I am more interested on the second patch I just sent ) Thanks !