From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dmitry Kravkov" Subject: Re: skb_warn_bad_offload with kernel 3.5 (maybe gso/bridge related ?) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:50:09 +0300 Message-ID: <1344250209.24187.1.camel@lb-tlvb-dmitry> References: <501B8792.6040605@univ-nantes.fr> <1343983887.9299.817.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1344008408.4642.160.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <20120806091846.GA18581@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Ben Hutchings" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Yann Dupont" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: "Herbert Xu" Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:3515 "EHLO mms3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755801Ab2HFKuO (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 06:50:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120806091846.GA18581@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:18 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > I think GRO is doing the right thing, and I can't think why we should > > see ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL if the skb is forwarded by a bridge. I > > If it is was created by GRO then it should always be CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, > even if it came through a bridge. > > Cheers, Is LRO on for bnx2x device? It should be off when forwarding is enabled.